For many years there was a single dependable path to keep data on your computer – by using a hard disk drive (HDD). Nonetheless, this type of technology is currently expressing it’s age – hard disks are actually loud and sluggish; they are power–ravenous and are likely to produce a lot of warmth during serious operations.

SSD drives, in contrast, are swift, take in a smaller amount energy and are also much cooler. They offer a brand new approach to file access and storage and are years in advance of HDDs when considering file read/write speed, I/O effectiveness and then energy efficiency. Discover how HDDs stand up against the more recent SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

After the release of SSD drives, file accessibility speeds are now tremendous. As a result of completely new electronic interfaces used in SSD drives, the typical data file access time has been reduced towards a all–time low of 0.1millisecond.

Image

HDD drives make use of rotating disks for files storage applications. When a file is being accessed, you have to wait around for the correct disk to get to the right place for the laser beam to reach the data file you want. This translates into a typical access rate of 5 to 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

Because of the very same radical solution which allows for quicker access times, you too can enjoy better I/O effectiveness with SSD drives. They are able to complete twice as many procedures within a given time compared to an HDD drive.

An SSD can deal with at the least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

With an HDD drive, the I/O performance progressively raises the more you employ the disk drive. Nonetheless, once it extends to a certain cap, it can’t get swifter. And due to the now–old concept, that I/O limitation is much lower than what you could have having an SSD.

HDD are only able to go so far as 400 IO’s per second.

3. Reliability

Image

SSD drives are designed to include as fewer rotating parts as is practical. They use a comparable technique like the one used in flash drives and are also significantly more dependable compared to common HDD drives.

SSDs offer an typical failure rate of 0.5%.

Image

Since we have previously observed, HDD drives make use of spinning disks. And something that utilizes a large number of moving parts for continuous amounts of time is at risk of failing.

HDD drives’ common rate of failing can vary between 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSD drives work almost noiselessly; they don’t produce excessive warmth; they don’t involve supplemental cooling solutions as well as consume a lot less electricity.

Trials have established that the normal electricity use of an SSD drive is amongst 2 and 5 watts.

Image

HDD drives are famous for being noisy. They want more electric power for chilling applications. With a hosting server which has lots of HDDs running all the time, you need a great number of fans to ensure they are kept cool – this may cause them a lot less energy–economical than SSD drives.

HDDs take in somewhere between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

SSD drives support faster data accessibility speeds, which will, consequently, permit the processor to complete data file requests much faster and then to go back to additional tasks.

The average I/O wait for SSD drives is only 1%.

Image

When compared with SSDs, HDDs allow for reduced file access rates. The CPU will be required to wait around for the HDD to come back the inquired data, reserving its resources while waiting.

The normal I/O wait for HDD drives is around 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

In real life, SSDs carry out as wonderfully as they did during khmer Linux’s testing. We ran a complete system back–up using one of our own production web servers. Over the backup operation, the regular service time for any I/O calls was under 20 ms.

Image

With the same hosting server, however this time furnished with HDDs, the effects were totally different. The regular service time for an I/O query changed somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

Talking about backups and SSDs – we have witnessed a great advancement with the back–up speed as we turned to SSDs. Currently, a typical server back up can take just 6 hours.

Image

Alternatively, with a hosting server with HDD drives, a comparable back up usually requires 3 to 4 times as long to complete. A full back–up of an HDD–equipped web server often takes 20 to 24 hours.

The web hosting plans accounts include SSD drives by default. Be part of our family here, at khmer Linux, and find out how we can assist you to improve your web site.

  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • All of our Virtual Private Servers include no setup rates and function in a dependable network delivering 99.9% of uptime. Full root server access privileges guaranteed.

  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Very easily compare the quotas and capabilities offered by khmer Linux’s Virtual Private Servers. Discover which VPS Hosting package will give you just what you’ll need to take care of your multi–media online presence effortlessly.
  • Compare our hosting plans

  • Contact Us

  •  
  • Contact us 24 hours a day by email or by making use of our super–fast ticketing system. Our techs are ready to respond to any questions within 60 mins.